"Christmas - the time to fix the computers of your loved ones" « Lord Wyrm

Palit Revolution 700

JC 13.01.2009 - 12:51 2361 4
Posts

JC

Administrator
Disruptor
Avatar
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Katratzi
Posts: 9067
Review @ bit-tech.net
Zitat
click to enlarge
What it has in abundance is cooling ability. The triple slot, dual 80mm cooler is certainly very capable, cooling the card's twin GPUs between 8°C and 16°C cooler than those of a stock cooled card when under load. It's also audibly quieter than a stock 4870 X2 at both idle and load, and while never silent, is a marked improvement over the stock air cooler under every situation.

[...]While our overclocking proved that there was plenty of performance left to be unlocked, with the ability to easily match Sapphire's much more expensive water cooled HD 4870 X2 Atomic, mileage between GPUs will vary and there's no guarantee you'll get a card as capable as our review sample.

[...]There's also the downside of using such an absolutely massive card. Taking up three expansion slots, not to mention a whole lot of motherboard space means you'll need to think twice before picking the Revolution 700 up, lest you find it won't fit due to it obscuring SATA ports or fan headers. CrossFire setups will suffer from similar issues, with the triple slot cooler potentially obscuring your second PCI-E slot - not that we'd advise fitting a card too close to the R700 anyway, as it's cooling solution is reliant on good airflow for the twin 80mm cooling fans.

Perhaps the biggest problem though is Revolution 700's abysmal idle power consumption. While Palit has been using custom PCB and power delivery designs on its RV770 cards ever since launch day, in the past we've seen decreases in power consumption in comparison to stock cards, not increases, and especially not 130W increases, and at idle to boot! While average and peak loads are more in line with what we'd expect from a Radeon HD 4870 X2, the terribly high idle power consumption is a real problem here.

SaxoVtsMike

R.I.P. Karl
Avatar
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: ö
Posts: 7957
Bin in der Mittagspause auch drübergestolpert.
Computerbase hat die Gainward trippleslot X2 getestet welche ja baugleich sein soll, und dort gabs den ausreißer mitm stromverbrauch nicht...

stevke

in the bin
Avatar
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Wien
Posts: 3956
Ein extremes Riesenteil ist das. Ist da CFX eigentlich auch noch möglich, also wenn man ein Board mit 2 Slots Zwischenraum hat.
Das wäre ja mal krank.

b_d

pixel imperfect
Avatar
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: 0x3FC
Posts: 10490
Zitat von stevke
Ein extremes Riesenteil ist das. Ist da CFX eigentlich auch noch möglich, also wenn man ein Board mit 2 Slots Zwischenraum hat.
Das wäre ja mal krank.
der platz für die steckverbindung ist vorhanden, würde also mal ja sagen :D

SaxoVtsMike

R.I.P. Karl
Avatar
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: ö
Posts: 7957
Theroetisch würde ich 2 von den dingern auf meinem rampage forumla unterbringen da zwischen dein beiden pcie slots 2 pciex1 dazwischen sind.
Praktisch hab ich aber _glaube_ ich zu wenig platz zwischen unterkante Mobo und case boden, da das tri slot teil übers mobo hinaus stehen würde..
Statt der 2. tri slot müßt ich halt ne _normale_ x2 nehmen..
Kontakt | Unser Forum | Über overclockers.at | Impressum | Datenschutz