o.v.e.r.clockers.at News Forum Registration is free! Articles Shop Search      
o.v.e.r.clockers.at
min/max
Identity
Not registered yet?
min/max
New Posts
min/max
Latest News
min/max
Links

 
Author
  
Post A Reply
JC

Administrator
Different Than Before

Avatar
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Katratzi
Posts: 8582

Review @ bit-tech.net
quote:

While on paper, the i7-930 is a mere 133MHz clock bump up from the i7-920, the fact that it's the same price and is slightly faster means that you'd be foolish to buy an i7-920 now (if you literally just bought one without knowing, then, sorry!).

What really sells us on the idea of the i7-930 though is it's improved overclocking potential. While there's no guarantee that every i7-930 will overclock as well as our test sample, it's very pleasing to see how much better it overclocked than any i7-920 we've played with over the 12 months at identical voltages. Any CPU, let alone one with four physical cores, four logical cores and triple-channel memory, that can run at 4.3GHz with a standard air-cooler is great news. Given that the i7-920 itself is a great overclocker, it's really good to see Intel launching an even more overclockable CPU at the same price, and not forcing enthusiasts into buying uber-expensive Extreme Editions.


__________________
Signature Image
We couldn't override their override of our override.
-Ka D'Argo

My User Feedback

Old Post 1st March 2010 10:41
Report to moderator Reply w/Quote
Aslinger

"old" oc.at Member

Avatar
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: カ&..
Posts: 6578

Scheint wohl ein paar Verbesserungen zu haben, weil der 930er ca. 10W weniger benötigt als der 920er, trotz gleichem Stepping.


__________________
Signature Image
Retro Vorgängersys!
i7 920 D0 @ 3.5 GHz, 1.07V, Megahalems+2xNoctua NF-P12 | Gigabyte EX58-UD5 | 3x 4GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1600C9 | Point of View GTX 570 | X-Fi Titanium PCI-E| Creative Inspire 5300 5.1 | be quiet! STRAIGHT POWER E6-650 | Crucial m4 SSD 128GB+1 TB Seagate 7200.12+2 TB Seagate 7200.14 | LG BDDVDRW CH10LS20 | Samsung P2770FH | Win 7 Ultimate x64 | X-Alien Case
Xfire Stats

Old Post 1st March 2010 10:58
Report to moderator Reply w/Quote
Starsky

Bazinga!

Avatar
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Graz
Posts: 12678

quote:

Originally posted by Aslinger
Scheint wohl ein paar Verbesserungen zu haben, weil der 930er ca. 10W weniger benötigt als der 920er, trotz gleichem Stepping.

quelle? tdp ist ja gleich geblieben.

/edit, ah ok - unter last bei standardtakt.


__________________
Signature Image
SBT-Feedback|forum-deluxe.at|Q6600@FSB 500

SYS: i7 2600K | Noctua NH-U12F | Asus P8Z77-V | 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 2133 | PowerColor HD 7970 @ GHz Edition | Corsair AX750W | 1x Crucial m4 128 GB | 2x WD Raptor 150 GB | LiteOn iHAS 524 | Coolermaster Stacker 830 NV Edition | Logitech G510 | Razer Lachesis | TFT: Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Mobil: HP Compaq 610 | HTC Wildfire S (Custom ROM)

Old Post 1st March 2010 11:14
Report to moderator Reply w/Quote
MaxMax

OC Addicted


Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Wien
Posts: 765

naja, laut xtremesystems.org bzw. im hardwareluxxforum ist die aktuelle i7-930 batch mit #3000xxxx bzw. #3001xxxx nicht so der hammer....
http://www.hardwareluxx.de/communit...79-post848.html
http://www.hardwareluxx.de/communit...63-post968.html

Last edited by MaxMax on 1st March 2010 at 14:23

Old Post 1st March 2010 14:19
Report to moderator Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT +1 hour. The time now is 17:24.
  
Post A Reply
 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - Forums - About o.v.e.r.clockers.at - Impressum - Werbung schalten? >

© all rights reserved by o.v.e.r.clockers.at 2000-2013
overclockers.at 4.4b based on vBulletin 2.2.5
Page generated in 0.172 seconds (SQL-time: 0.036 seconds, 58 queries)
sponsored by www.nessus.at