chameleon mark

was haltet ihr vom neuen nvidia-bench?
ein geschwindigkeitsvergleich mit ati-karten (nvidia optimierter?) bzw gf4 zu gf3 (shaderlastig) wäre intressant

meine scores:

drawing style real at 1024x768
299f / 4.337s = 68.9417 fps

drawing style glass at 1024x768
299f / 6.239s = 47.9243 fps

drawing style shiny at 1024x768
299f / 5.037s = 59.3607 fps

drawing style real at 1280x1024
299f / 5.558s = 53.7963 fps

drawing style glass at 1280x1024
299f / 6.669s = 44.8343 fps

drawing style shiny at 1280x1024
299f / 6.629s = 45.1048 fps

drawing style real at 1600x1200
299f / 6.89s = 43.3962 fps

drawing style glass at 1600x1200
299f / 8.743s = 34.1988 fps

drawing style shiny at 1600x1200
299f / 8.372s = 35.7143 fps

http://mediaxplosion.gamigo.de/

oder http://www.nvidia.com =)

ich hab mal einen gesaugt, der wollt auf meiner r8500 gleichmal garnet rennen

drawing style glass at 1024x768
299f / 3.536s = 84.5588 fps

drawing style real at 1024x768
299f / 2.664s = 112.237 fps

drawing style shiny at 1024x768
299f / 3.505s = 85.3067 fps

drawing style glass at 1280x1024
299f / 5.157s = 57.9794 fps

drawing style real at 1280x1024
299f / 3.815s = 78.3748 fps

drawing style shiny at 1280x1024
299f / 5.157s = 57.9794 fps

drawing style glass at 1600x1200
299f / 6.8s = 43.9706 fps

drawing style real at 1600x1200
299f / 4.988s = 59.9439 fps

drawing style shiny at 1600x1200
299f / 6.81s = 43.906 fps

__________________________--

naja, is a ned viel schneller mit einer gf4, allerdings wenn ich 4x fsaa einschalt komm ich fast auf die selben Werte wie du
(gf4 @ 305/715)

ih hoss die nvidia benchs funkz die unter win2k ned?

er meint i hob zu wenig arbeits speicher!