Intel vs AMD - integrated graphics shoot-out

Zitat

"...There's not much to choose between the test systems when it comes to games. The Intel box's scores were higher, but then it didn't offer the choice to show off its graphics muscles at the price of a lower frame-rate the way the AMD/Nvidia machine did. We'd rather have the ability to turn off some of the eye candy to balance frame rate how we want, not the way the driver thinks we should have it. But will occasional gamers care? Probably not. And most of their time will be spent, surely, in apps that don't tax the GPU.

That will change with Vista, when the OS is going to want some graphics chip time too. But the upshot of our tests is that AMD is whistling if it thinks that Intel can't run Windows Vista in all of its Aero glory on G965 graphics. It can, and it looks great and it is our opinion that Intel is fully ready for 2007.."

Reghardware

Und was bringst überhaupt ipgs in spielen gegeneinander anzutreten lassen?

Selbst casual gamer kaufen sich dezidiert grakas. Selbst wenns nur eine x1300 oder gf7300 ist, sind die meilenweit vor den igps...

Die hätten lieber schaun sollen, wies zb. mit der cpu belastung bei HD contetn aussieht.

beim HD Content müsste Nvidia Rulen.

btw, gibts da nicht einen Chip von ATI, der einer X700 entspricht? RS 690 oder so?