Today is mind your Bufferbloat day!
Neuer ISP Vertrag, mehr Bandbreite, neues Modem atuelle Bufferbloat TestsOpenWrt 22.03 (old, I know  ) 250Mbit down => 600 Mbit down Via Smart Queue Management habe ich die Wahl zwischen fq_codel oder cake als Queueing discipline und darunter einige Queue setup scripts: layer_cake.qos: This uses the cake qdisc as a replacement for both htb as shaper and fq_codel as leaf qdisc. This exercises cake's diffserv profile(s) as different "layers" of priority. This script requires that cake is selected as qdisc, and forces its usage. See: http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Cake for more information
simple.qos: BW-limited three-tier prioritisation scheme with your qdisc on each queue. (default)
piece_of_cake.qos: This just uses the cake qdisc as a replacement for both htb as shaper and fq_codel as leaf qdisc. It just does not come any simpler than this, in other words it truely is a "piece of cake". This script requires that cake is selected as qdisc, and forces its usage. See: http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Cake for more information
simplest_tbf.qos: Simplest possible configuration (TBF): TBF rate limiter with your qdisc attached. TBF may give better performance than HTB on some architectures.
simplest.qos: Simplest possible configuration: HTB rate limiter with your qdisc attached. "ingress" Einstellung (Download):629000 kbit/s "egress" Einstellung (Upload): 68000 kbit/s Testergebnisse: Kein QoS aktiv:  simple qos:  layer_cake qos:  Winner run #1 (piece_of_cake):  Winner run #2 (piece_of_cake):  Für mich die relevantesten Werte sind Jitter & mean Ping unter aktivem download/upload => sehr stable mit kaum Bandbreiteneinbüßung. Ich hatte bisher mit cake als Queueing discipline mehr Bandbreite eingebußt, bei ähnlich guten Ergebnissen sonst. Bin sehr happy mit dem outcome, ganz ohne ingress/egress angegriffen zu haben. edit: oha, grad noch gelesen dass Packet steering noch was bringen soll ja, tut es :winning:
Bearbeitet von TOM am 27.11.2025, 13:42
|